how do I obtain passport data from a supplier outside the EU
The importer requests, the supplier delivers
Whoever places furniture from outside the EU on the European market is considered an importer under the ESPR, and that role carries its own obligation: to verify that the digital product passport exists and is correct before the product is placed on the EU market. In practice, this means that the data needed for the passport must be requested from the manufacturer outside the EU — materials, composition, origin of components, and everything else required for that product's passport. The EU importer is not the one who invents or supplements this data with an estimate; that data must come from the manufacturer, and the importer checks what is received.
For whom this applies, and where it transitions to something else
This question is specific to the party designated as the importer: the person who places a piece of furniture from a manufacturer outside the EU on the European market for the first time. For a project furnisher or trader who purchases furniture from an EU importer, it is different — they connect with a supplier already located within the EU, which is a different route than described here. For those who import directly from a country outside the EU, the distinction between "manufacturer" and "importer" under Article 29 of the ESPR is relevant: the importer has its own, independent obligation, separate from what the manufacturer does in the country of origin. What this article does not regulate is how the manufacturer provides the data precisely or in what form — that is something agreed between the parties in practice. More on what the passport concretely means in this import situation is in what the product passport means for imports from outside the EU.
No fixed date yet, but a clear direction
There is no established date yet for when this obligation takes effect for furniture. The ESPR itself is the framework regulation; which product groups must have a passport and when is determined for each product group in a separate delegated act. For furniture, that act does not yet exist. What is established is the mechanism in Article 38 and Article 29: once the obligation takes effect, the responsibility for passing on data in the chain rests with the actors designated by the ESPR for this purpose, and that responsibility does not automatically shift because a manufacturer is located outside the EU. Until the date is set, there is no legal obligation to request this data yet — but nothing prevents an importer from arranging the supply now, precisely because that will save time later. This page will be updated as soon as the delegated act for furniture is published.
How this is addressed in practice
The first step is to establish exactly which data is needed for the passport of the piece of furniture in question — an overview of this is in which data is requested from the supplier. After that, it is advisable not to arrange this supply verbally or by separate email, but to set it out in the purchase agreement with the manufacturer outside the EU: which data, in what form, and at what time. How this is arranged contractually is set out in agreements on the provision of passport data in the purchasing contract. With a supplier outside the EU, this is particularly important because there is no shared EU supervisory framework that holds the manufacturer directly accountable — the importer stands between the manufacturer and the European market, and therefore bears a greater share of the risk if data is missing or incorrect.
Once the data arrives, the next step is to verify it for accuracy and completeness rather than accepting it as is; how this verification is set up is in verifying data for accuracy. If the manufacturer does not provide the data, provides it incompletely, or provides it too late, this is a situation that occurs frequently and for which an approach exists — see what to do if the supplier does not provide the data. It is also important whether this concerns a complete piece of furniture or a semi-finished product that is further processed: for subcontractors and suppliers of components, similar questions apply about who supplies which data, as described at or a subcontractor that supplies semi-finished products must also provide product passport dataAt customs controls on the digital product passport, as provided for in Article 15 of the ESPR, it is the importer who can be held accountable for the absence or incorrectness of this data — a reason to have this chain in order beforehand rather than only during a control.
Substantiation: Articles 29, 38, 10 and 15 of the ESPR
Article 29 of the ESPR describes the obligations of importers, including checking whether the digital product passport is present and correct before a product is placed on the EU market. Article 38 regulates the requirements for actors in the supply chain, and thus the basis for passing on product data between manufacturer, importer and other links. Article 10 describes what the digital product passport must contain in terms of content, which determines which data must first be requested from the manufacturer outside the EU. Article 15 regulates customs controls on the digital product passport at import, which directly affects the importer at the moment a piece of furniture crosses the EU border.
What to do now
If a company is already importing furniture from outside the EU, it can, without waiting for the delegated act, map out which manufacturers are engaged, which data those manufacturers normally already maintain (such as material composition and origin), and whether the existing purchase contracts allow for a supply obligation for passport data to be added later. If you are unsure whether your own products will be subject to the obligation in the future, you will find an initial check at whether the product passport will apply to your furniture.
This is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), article 10 (requirements for the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 15 (customs controls relating to the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 29 (obligations of importers)
The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We refer per statement; you do not need to believe us.
What you concretely have to do
What is expected of you
A company that imports furniture from outside the EU takes on a position that the ESPR explicitly names: that of importer. This brings its own obligations, regardless of what the manufacturer does or does not do in the country of origin.
The importer is responsible for a complete passport
Article 29 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) places on the importer the obligation to check that the product for which a digital product passport is mandatory actually has that passport, and that the passport contains the data prescribed by Article 10 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means in practice that the manufacturer outside the EU does not automatically supply what is needed — the importer must follow up themselves and must also be able to assess themselves whether what is received is complete. More about what this precisely means for the import position can be found at what the product passport means if you import furniture from outside the EU.
Data must be present before the product crosses the border
Article 15 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) links the digital product passport to customs controls. This means that the passport is not something that is supplemented afterwards, after arrival — the data must be there at the moment the product enters the EU. For the practice of an importer, this means that requesting data from the supplier must happen well before shipment, not only when the container is already on its way.
The actor in the supply chain supplies what is necessary for the passport
Article 38 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes what is expected of actors in the supply chain when it comes to making available the information needed to comply with the obligations of the regulation. A supplier outside the EU is not directly subject to the ESPR — the regulation is EU law — but the importer who places the product on the EU market can only fulfil this obligation if the supplier provides the underlying data. This makes the supplier in fact the party from which the information must come, even though the legal obligation rests with the importer. Which specific data that is, is described on which data you must request from your furniture supplier.
Contractual agreements are the only reliable approach
Because a supplier outside the EU is not subject to EU oversight, there is no supervisory authority that can directly call on this supplier to provide product passport data. The only instrument the importer has at its disposal is the agreement laid down in the purchase contract. For a company that procures structurally from the same manufacturer, it makes sense not to renegotiate this per order but to establish once and for all how the provision of product passport data in the purchase contract is anchored.
Where things go wrong in practice
The supplier sends general product information, not product passport data. A manufacturer outside the EU often supplies a product sheet or technical file drawn up for their own market. These documents typically lack specific data such as material origin or composition per component, whereas the passport does require this.
Data arrive only after shipment. Because the supplier is used to adding documentation with the invoice or packing slip, product passport data sometimes arrive only when the product is already at sea. That is too late given the link with customs checks.
Wood or material origin is not specified. For furniture with wooden components, a clear declaration of origin is regularly missing, even though this is an item that deserves separate attention — see how the origin of the wood is recorded.
Subcontractors of the foreign manufacturer remain out of view. A manufacturer outside the EU often works with suppliers themselves for components or semi-finished goods. The importer only sees the end manufacturer and has no visibility of what happens further down the chain, even though that subcontractor may have relevant data — see or a subcontractor that supplies semi-finished products must also provide product passport data.
There is no second supplier if the first refuses or delays. When procuring the same component from different manufacturers outside the EU, there is a risk that one delivers and the other does not, without having agreed in advance how to handle this — see what to do if the same component is purchased from different suppliers.
What you can put in order now
- A fixed specification of the requested data, based on what Article 10 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) prescribes, so that the supplier does not have to guess what is needed.
- A delivery deadline before shipment, included in the purchase contract or purchase order, so that data is available before the product crosses the border.
- A contact person at the supplier who is responsible for providing product passport data, with a fixed delivery route (for example a standard template or portal).
- An escalation procedure in case the supplier does not deliver or delivers incompletely — what happens then is set out on what you can do if your supplier does not provide the data.
- A verification step upon receipt, in which it is established how the received data are checked for accuracy — see how you verify the accuracy of data from your supplier.
- An archive of correspondence with the supplier about requested and supplied data, so that at a later date it is demonstrable which steps have been taken.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not right? Let us know — corrections take priority.