furnipas.eu

in which language must I provide the product passport of my piece of furniture

The language of the member state where the furniture is sold

The product passport will be made available in the language or languages that the member state where the product is placed on the market requires. For the Dutch market, this means in practice Dutch, and for the Belgian market, Dutch, French and German are added, depending on the regional language regime. If a manufacturer or importer sells in multiple EU countries, the passport will be available in multiple language versions — one for each market where the product is offered. This is laid down as a general principle in the ESPR, Article 10, which sets out the requirements for the digital product passport.

Which furniture is covered and what still needs to be determined

This language rule applies in principle to each product for which the digital product passport becomes mandatory, including furniture once a delegated act comes into force for it. The precise, product-specific implementation — which data fields are mandatory, and whether a specific language provision applies that deviates from the general principle — will only follow from that delegated act for furniture itself. The ESPR, Articles 5 to 7, provides the framework within which such an act is drawn up, but the furniture-specific text does not yet exist. What therefore remains uncertain: whether an exception or addition to the general language rule will apply for furniture, and which data exactly must be translated versus which remain language-neutral as code, number or pictogram. What is already reasonably foreseeable based on the general system: part of the content of a product passport — brand name, article number, technical coding — is by definition not language-dependent, while descriptive information (material composition, maintenance instructions, processing instructions) is indeed provided in the language of the market.

No fixed date yet, but an established framework

There is no definitive date yet on which the digital product passport for furniture becomes mandatory; the ESPR work plan 2025-2030 mentions a delegated act for furniture as expected around 2028, but this is a projection and not an established obligation. Once the delegated act for furniture has been published, the actual date will be posted here. Until then, the general framework of the ESPR is already fixed, including the principle that a product passport is offered in the language of the sales market. Manufacturers and importers who begin now to organise their product information do so within a framework whose main lines are known, even though the furniture-specific final date has not yet been determined.

How to implement this in practice

Anyone preparing for this begins by identifying the countries where the furniture is sold — because that determines which language versions are needed, not the language of the head office or factory. Next, it is useful to distinguish between data that must be translated (material descriptions, maintenance advice, warranty terms) and data that remains language-neutral (article codes, dimensions in figures, GS1 identification codes). For the latter, it is helpful to know how each product receives a unique, language-independent code — see how each product receives a unique identification code — because that code forms the fixed core of the passport, regardless of which language version the buyer opens. After that, it is practical to determine how the different language versions are technically offered: as a separate document per language, or as one passport with language selection when scanning the QR code. Anyone already managing product data in an ERP or inventory system can already check how multilingual fields are recorded in it — this connects to the question of whether the product passport can be linked to your own ERP or inventory system. For sales via a platform or webshop, it is moreover relevant that the provider of an online marketplace has its own role in making product information visible to the consumer, regulated in the ESPR, Article 35 — which means that the language choice is not only a matter for the manufacturer, but also for the party offering the product online. Distributors and traders furthermore have their own obligation to verify that the passport is present and accessible before a product is sold, as described in the ESPR, Articles 30 and 31 — which indirectly also relates to the question of whether the offered language version is suited to the market in which the product is sold.

Based on: Article 10 and Articles 5-7 of the ESPR

The language rule for the digital product passport follows from Article 10 of the ESPR, Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, which sets out the general requirements for the passport, including the languages in which it must be available. The product-specific implementation for furniture — including any particularities concerning language — follows from a delegated act to be drawn up within the framework of Articles 5 to 7 of the same regulation. That delegated act does not yet exist for furniture; once it is published, that will be the source for the furniture-specific details.

Businesses already selling furniture in multiple EU Member States would be well advised to inventory the product information per language version and separate it from language-neutral data such as identification codes and technical encodings, so that the furnipas.eu platform can process that information directly into the passport once the furniture-specific rules are published.

What you concretely have to do

What is expected of you

The ESPR itself does not list in Article 10 a fixed set of languages in which the product passport must be offered. What is stated: the information in the passport must be accessible and understandable to the parties entitled to it — consumers, market participants, enforcement authorities. The specific language requirements are elaborated per product group in the delegated act which for furniture has not yet been published. Until then, there is no exact language rule to assess against, but there are several indications from the regulation itself about the direction this is taking.

Information must be understandable for those consulting the passport

Articles 5 to 7 of the ESPR provide that information requirements are intended to enable users — including consumers — to make informed choices. For a business with 10 to 100 employees, this means in practice that a passport available only in the manufacturer's source language will probably not serve the purpose of the regulation once the product is placed on the market in a different Member State. The expectation that emerges from the text is that the language aligns with the market in which the product is sold — not with the language of the head office.

Obligations of distributors and traders also concern language

Articles 30 and 31 of the ESPR describe the role of distributors and traders in checking whether a product is accompanied by the required product passport. Anyone selling furniture through an intermediary in another country should bear in mind that this intermediary will want to verify whether the information in the passport is understandable to the end user in that country. This is not a separate language obligation distinct from Article 10, but it explains why an importer or project furnisher will in practice nevertheless ask for it.

Online marketplaces may impose their own requirements

Article 35 of the ESPR regulates the obligations of online marketplace and search engine providers regarding product information. That article does not specifically address language, but platforms offering products in multiple Member States often impose their own requirements on the language of product information in order to meet their own obligations. A furniture manufacturer selling through such a platform would be well advised to verify what language requirements the platform itself applies, separate from what the ESPR directly prescribes.

Where things go wrong in practice

A few situations that already occur with companies preparing for the product passport:

  • A manufacturer compiles the passport in the language of the country of production and assumes this is sufficient, because there is no delegated act with an explicit language list yet. Once the product is sold in multiple Member States, discussion arises with the importer over who is responsible for the translation.
  • A project manager sources furniture from different suppliers and discovers that each passport is drawn up in a different language, without any coordination. For the end user — for example a facilities company that consults the passport during maintenance — this results in a passport that does not match their own working language.
  • An importer assumes the manufacturer is responsible for the correct language, while the manufacturer assumes the importer will handle this because they know the local market. Without an agreement, this remains unresolved until a supervisory authority or trader inquires about it.
  • A company translates only the visible product page, but not the underlying technical data that is linked to the passport via the unique identification code to the passport. With partial translation, there is a risk that critical information — such as repair instructions — remains available only in the source language.
  • A manufacturer confuses the language of the passport with the language of the website to which the QR code of the product points. These are two separate issues: the QR code itself is language-neutral, but the page it unlocks must match the user who scans it.

What you can put in order now

  • An overview of the countries in which the furniture is sold, as a basis for determining in which languages the passport must be available at any time.
  • An agreement with importers or distributors about who is responsible for which translation and who bears ultimate responsibility for its accuracy.
  • A version control of translated passports, so that when data is modified after publication it is clear which language versions need to be updated again.
  • A fixed procedure for linking source language data from your own system to translated fields, especially relevant when the passport is linked to the ERP or inventory system.
  • A note on the language choice per product group, so that when the delegated act is published, it can quickly be checked whether the choices made still align with what is then established — including any requirements that can be found via the European product passport register.

Once the delegated act for furniture is published and contains a specific language requirement, this article will be updated accordingly.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not right? Let us know — corrections take priority.