furnipas.eu

what fine or sanction do I receive if I do not have a product passport

Sanctions have not yet been established, but enforcement is coming

At present, there is no concrete fine or sanction described for the absence of a digital product passport for furniture. This does not mean that nothing has been arranged: the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) requires Member States to establish rules for the enforcement of the regulation, and those rules must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. What that sanction in the Netherlands (or another Member State) will be exactly — a fine, a sales ban, a recall action, or something else — is a matter for the national legislator and has not yet been determined. Additionally, Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 determines how market surveillance works: what powers a market surveillance authority has to check products and take action if something does not comply with the rules.

Who this applies to and who it does not

This uncertainty about sanctions concerns the question "what happens if the passport is missing", and that question cannot yet be answered with a figure. What is already clear is the question of who has which obligation: the ESPR establishes in Article 27 what a manufacturer must do to comply with the regulation, and those obligations exist independently of the question what sanction will apply to non-compliance. For those wondering whether they are regarded as a manufacturer, importer or distributor in this regard, that is a separate question that can be answered independently of sanctions — see who is responsible for the digital product passport of furniture and am I an importer or manufacturer under the ESPR. This topic is not about what must be in the passport, nor about the question whether a particular furniture product falls under the ESPR or not — that is determined per product group separately in a delegated act, and for furniture no such act has been published yet.

The date is not yet fixed

For furniture, no delegated act has been published making the product passport mandatory, and as long as it is not, there is also no moment at which a sanction for a missing passport for furniture can actually be imposed. According to the ESPR work programme 2025-2030, that delegated act for furniture is expected around 2028, but that is a planning projection, not a commitment — the actual date depends on the legislative process and will be updated on this page as soon as the act is published. Until that time, there is no legal obligation for furniture to have a digital product passport, and therefore no sanction linked to it. What does already apply, independently of the passport, is the general market surveillance regime from Regulation (EU) 2019/1020: supervisors can already take action against products that do not comply with existing legislation, regardless of the ESPR.

What this means in practice

The most practical approach is not to wait until the sanction is known, but to know in good time what is already established. First, it is important to be clear about what role someone plays in the supply chain — manufacturer, importer, distributor or someone who places goods on the market under their own brand — because the obligations arising from Article 27 of the ESPR differ per role. Someone who places furniture on the market under their own brand may face different obligations than someone who acts purely as a trader; that difference is described in I sell furniture under my own brand — what obligations do I face and with what obligations does a distributor or trader of furniture have. Next, it is useful to look at what can already be prepared practically, even without the sanction or the exact start date being established — think of putting product data in order, documenting the origin of materials, and arranging the relationship with suppliers if data from them are required. What actually happens if a passport is simply missing once the obligation comes into force is described in what happens if I don't have a product passport for my furniture. Meanwhile, it remains wise not to delay asking questions about liability: if data in a passport are to come from a supplier and they turn out to be incorrect, the question of who is responsible for this is relevant to clarify in advance, as explained in who is liable for incorrect data from a supplier in the passport.

Where this follows from: Article 27 and the market surveillance regulation

The obligation for manufacturers to comply with the ESPR is set out in Article 27 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781; this regulation also contains Article 40, which concerns the prevention of circumvention of the rules and deterioration of performance, indicating that the legislator wants to ensure serious enforcement and compliance — although the concrete sanction for this is a matter for the Member States. How market surveillance works in practice, what powers authorities have to control products and what measures they can take, is set out in Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. Together, these two regulations form the framework within which a sanctions regime must fit, without the amount or form of that sanction being fixed yet.

If you are already working with a supplier or private label partner, it is best to clarify clearly who supplies which passport data; how the division of roles typically works for private label furniture is described at who must provide the passport data for private label furniture. As soon as the delegated act for furniture is published, including a concrete entry into force date and initial enforcement guidance, this page will be updated.

What you concretely have to do

What is expected of you

The sanctions regime for the product passport is not yet detailed at this time. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) requires countries to provide effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for infringement, but the concrete amounts and forms are worked out at national level. This means that a company cannot currently check which amount corresponds to which infringement — that information does not yet exist in final form. What is already established is which behaviour the legislator wants to prevent and who is responsible for it.

Ensure the passport is in place before the product comes on the market

Article 27 of the ESPR sets out the obligations of manufacturers, including ensuring that a product is accompanied by the required product passport at the moment it is placed on the market. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this practically means that the passport cannot be an afterthought but becomes part of the process before dispatch or delivery. If a company does not organise that process, it risks products already being in transit to customers or distributors while the passport is still missing.

Know who in your own supply chain bears that obligation

Not every company in the supply chain has the same role, and the obligation to provide the passport does not automatically lie with everyone. Who is responsible for the product passport for furniture? describes how that division works in practice. For companies that do not themselves manufacture but do place products on the market, the distinction between roles is relevant to determine who bears which part of the sanction-sensitive obligations — see also Am I an importer or a manufacturer according to the ESPR?

Do not circumvent or deteriorate performance

Article 40 of the ESPR is aimed at preventing circumvention and deterioration of performance. This article is not only about the absence of a passport, but also situations where a company formally complies with the requirements but in practice hollows out their effect — for example by allowing data to become outdated or by adapting a product in such a way that the original passport data no longer match. For a medium-sized company, this means that changes to a product, even minor ones, can have consequences for the validity of a previously issued passport.

Taking market surveillance into account

Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 governs how market surveillance authorities check whether products comply with applicable requirements and what powers they have to do so. That surveillance is not theoretical: it concerns authorities that can request and check products, documentation and records. For a company, this means that the presence of a passport is not only an obligation towards the customer, but also something that a supervisor can check.

Where things go wrong in practice

A number of situations regularly occur in practice as a source of problems related to the passport:

A company launches a new product line and assumes that the passport will "come later", while the products are already with the customer.

An importer takes data from a manufacturer outside the EU without verification, and only discovers during a sample check that data is incomplete or incorrect — the question of who is responsible for this is not always immediately clear; see who is liable for incorrect data from a supplier in the passport.

A furniture brand has an existing product modified — a different frame, a different mechanism — without asking whether this modification makes the company itself a manufacturer with its own passport obligation; this is addressed in do I become a manufacturer if I have an existing piece of furniture modified or refined.

A private label seller assumes that the underlying manufacturer will arrange the passport without this ever being explicitly agreed — see who must provide the passport data for private label furniture.

A company selling via an online marketplace thinks that the platform takes on the obligation, while the own responsibility remains; this is covered in What does the product passport mean if I sell furniture via an online marketplace?

In all these situations, the problem does not arise from unwillingness, but from the absence of a documented agreement about who does what and at what time.

What you can put in order now

Even while the exact sanction levels are still unknown, there is already much that can be established now that will provide support later during an inspection or a discussion within the chain:

Anyone who already has this kind of agreements and overviews in order will be better positioned when national sanction schemes are finally established — and can then quickly assess what that concretely means for their own position in the chain. For a broader picture of the consequences of a missing passport, apart from the sanction issue, is What happens if I don't have a digital product passport for my furniture? a logical follow-up.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not right? Let us know — corrections take priority.