furnipas.eu

Do built-in furniture fall under the Construction Products Regulation or under the ESPR?

Built-in furniture: furniture function or building function is decisive

Whether a built-in piece of furniture falls under the Construction Products Regulation or under the ESPR depends in most cases on the function it performs, not on whether it is free-standing or fixed. A kitchen cabinet, a fitted wardrobe or a fixed desk remains in practice a piece of furniture if its function is storage, seating or working — even when it is attached to a wall, floor or another cabinet. The Construction Products Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/3110) is written for products that are permanently incorporated into a building and whose performance counts towards the essential characteristics of that building itself, such as load-bearing capacity, fire safety or sound insulation. A piece of furniture that happens to be fixed does not automatically change its character as a result. Only when a built-in element also plays a role in those building properties — for example as part of a fire-resistant partition wall — does the Construction Products Regulation come into play for that specific aspect.

For whom this is relevant, and for whom it is not

This distinction is relevant for manufacturers and importers of fitted kitchens, fitted wardrobes, fitted cupboards, built-in seating benches and comparable project furniture that is supplied to or installed in construction. It is not relevant for loose furniture without a building function, such as chairs, tables or free-standing cabinets: these fall unquestionably within the furniture domain. It is equally irrelevant for building elements that have no furniture function, such as load-bearing structures, facade elements or fire-resistant walls without storage or seating function: these fall unquestionably under the Construction Products Regulation. The difficult area lies precisely between these two extremes: products that appear to be both furniture and building elements, such as a permanently built-in cabinet wall that also serves as a partition between two rooms. This platform and the digital product passport created on it are concerned only with the furniture side of a product — not with any CE marking or performance declaration that may apply separately to the building function.

Neither of these dates is yet fixed for this precise demarcation

There is currently no established, product-specific list that specifies for each type of built-in furniture under which regulation it falls. The ESPR is a framework regulation: Article 1 determines the subject matter and scope and regulates how this regulation relates to other Union legislation that already sets requirements for the same aspects of a product, so that there are no duplicate or conflicting rules. For furniture, the concrete requirements — and with them also the precise product group description in which a built-in piece of furniture does or does not count — must still be laid down in a delegated act. This has not yet been published for furniture; the platform expects a working digital passport around 2030, but that date is not yet fixed. Until this publication, there is no obligation for furniture to have a digital product passport, and there is therefore no official, published demarcation text specifically for built-in furniture to fall back on. The Construction Products Regulation itself is already established and regulates its own procedures for CE marking and performance declarations for products that fall under it, separately from this furniture process.

How to assess this in practice

If there is doubt about a built-in product, it is useful first to establish its primary function: does the product primarily serve storage, seating or working, or does it contribute to a property of the building itself such as load-bearing capacity, fire resistance, sound insulation or the energy performance of the building envelope. A second step is to look at how the product is sold and installed: as a standalone piece of furniture that is fixed in place on site, or as part of a building system for which a performance declaration and CE marking are already issued. A third step is to check whether CE marking under the Construction Products Regulation already exists for the element: this is a concrete signal that it is being treated as a construction product in that respect. If the conclusion remains that the product is fundamentally furniture, it is useful in the longer term to maintain in a structured manner the data that will later be needed for the digital product passport (materials, origin, composition), so that these do not have to be researched again. In a borderline case where both a furniture and a building function are plausible, it is advisable to document your own assessment and, once the delegated act for furniture appears, to compare that assessment against the final product group description.

The basis: Construction Products Regulation and Article 1 of the ESPR

The Construction Products Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/3110) applies to products manufactured to be permanently incorporated in buildings and whose performance affects the performance of the building itself in relation to the essential characteristics that apply to it. Article 1 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes the subject matter and scope of the ecodesign regulation and the manner in which overlap with other sectoral Union legislation is prevented, so that the same aspect of a product is not regulated twice. From these two starting points follows the distinction between furniture function and building function as described above, although a delegated act that specifies this for furniture is not yet in place.

Anyone currently producing or supplying built-in furniture can best start by recording the function and form of sale of each model, and getting their own material and origin data in order — this work is necessary anyway once the rules for furniture become concrete, regardless of which regulation a specific product ultimately falls under.

This is based on

The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We refer per statement; you do not need to believe us.

What you concretely have to do

A kitchen cabinet screwed to the wall, a built-in cabinet in a hotel room, a counter that becomes a permanent part of a shop interior: with built-in furniture, it is not immediately clear which regulatory framework the product falls under. The Construction Products Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/3110) governs products that are permanently incorporated into construction works. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) governs sustainability requirements and the product passport for products in general, with furniture as one of the designated product categories. When a piece of furniture is built in, both frameworks may come into play, and that is precisely where the uncertainty arises.

No delegated act for furniture has yet been published, so there is currently no definitive answer to the question of which framework applies in which situation. What is already available: a distinction in the regulations themselves between "construction product" and "product" in the sense of the ESPR, with which a preliminary assessment can be made.

What is expected of you

Assess whether the furniture is a construction product

The Construction Products Regulation targets products that are intended to be permanently incorporated into construction works and that affect the performance of the construction work itself (think of fire safety, structural strength, sound insulation). A piece of furniture that operates as a standalone item and is only fastened for stability does not as a rule fall under this automatically. A piece of furniture that is designed as a building element, for example a wall that also provides storage space and is part of the fire separation, is a different matter. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means that the company's own product catalogue must be reviewed for these types of borderline cases, often by product line and not all at once for the entire range.

Check whether the furniture qualifies as a "product" under the ESPR

The ESPR applies to tangible goods placed on the market or put into service, with the exception of what is explicitly excluded (Article 1 of the ESPR). Furniture is mentioned as a potential product category, but the specific requirements will only come with the delegated act for this category. A company that manufactures or supplies built-in furniture is well advised to monitor which products of the furniture industry fall under the ESPR, as the delimitation is explained more precisely there than in the regulation itself.

Determine whether one product can fall under both

The two regulations do not necessarily exclude each other. A piece of furniture can be a construction product for the part of its function that affects the construction work, and at the same time a product in the sense of the ESPR for sustainability and information requirements. For a company, this means that the assessment does not stop at "which label fits best here", but that both frameworks must be examined separately on their own merits.

Document your own classification

Regardless of the outcome, it is practical to record why a particular piece of furniture has or has not been classified as a construction product, and whether or not as a product under the ESPR. This is not a legal obligation in itself, but a basis to fall back on as soon as a customer, importer or supervisor asks for an explanation of the choice made.

Where things go wrong in practice

A manufacturer of built-in kitchens assumes that "built-in" automatically means "construction product", and treats the entire range as such, without checking whether the cabinet as an independent piece of furniture also falls under the ESPR.

A project furnisher supplies fixed cabinets for a hotel chain and assumes that the client (the builder) is responsible for the product classification, while the furnisher itself is the manufacturer or importer of the furniture and thus the first party that must make this assessment.

A furniture maker works with custom-made pieces for fixed built-in situations and thinks that custom-made pieces are in any case outside both frameworks. Whether that is the case depends on the precise circumstances; the question comes back more broadly in bespoke furniture and project fitting.

A company assesses a product line once at launch, but does not repeat that assessment when a variant changes from loose furniture to a configuration that becomes standard built-in (for example, a cabinet that previously stood alone and is now mounted as a fixed unit against a fire-resistant wall).

An importer assumes that CE marking under the Construction Products Regulation automatically means that no product passport is required, and thereby misses that both obligations can apply independently of each other.

What you can put in order now

  • Per product line: a brief note with the assessment "construction product: yes/no" and "ESPR product: yes/no", with the arguments that led to that choice.
  • An overview of which furniture is standard sold loose and which is standard built-in, including the variants where this differs per project.
  • Correspondence with clients (builders, project developers) about who plays which role in the chain, especially when it is not immediately clear who the manufacturer or importer is within the meaning of the regulations.
  • A fixed procedure to review the assessment whenever a product changes in configuration or application, so that a choice made earlier does not remain tied to an old version of the furniture.
  • A link to the own assessment of the scope of application in the broader question whether the digital product passport applies to own furniture, so that the two assessments (construction product and ESPR product) lie alongside each other and do not arise separately within the organisation.

As long as the delegated act for furniture has not been published, part of this classification remains provisional. What is now documented about own product lines does not need to be researched anew upon publication, only updated with the requirements that then apply. When that moment becomes clear, is explained at the question of when the product passport becomes mandatory for furniture.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, reviewed by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections take priority.