furnipas.eu

What happens if I don't have a digital product passport for my furniture?

No obligation yet, later counts as non-compliant product

At present, nothing happens if a furniture manufacturer or importer does not have a digital product passport, because that obligation does not yet exist for furniture. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is the framework within which the European Commission will determine per product group which products require a passport and what it must contain. For furniture, that specification does not yet exist. Once it does, the situation changes: a product that is then placed on the market without the required passport is considered a product that does not comply with the applicable requirements. From that point on, it is no longer the ESPR itself that determines what happens, but the general market surveillance system under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020: checks, corrective measures and possibly restriction of access to the market.

For whom this applies, and what it does not apply to

This subject concerns manufacturers, importers and other economic operators placing furniture on the EU market at the time a product-specific requirement for a digital product passport is in force for that furniture. It does not concern the current situation: as long as there is no delegated act under the ESPR published for furniture, there is no passport obligation to comply with, and therefore no question of "doing nothing" in the legal sense. It also does not concern other obligations that may already apply independently of the product passport, such as general product safety or other European legislation — those fall outside this subject. And it does not concern the question of what a competent authority will decide in a specific case: that is for the competent authority, not for a prior description.

When this will apply is not yet fixed

There is no date yet on which the passport obligation for furniture will take effect. The work programme that the European Commission uses for the ESPR for the period 2025-2030 mentions 2028 as the expected time for the delegated act that will set the requirements for furniture, but that is an expectation, not an established fact. Once that act is published, it will also follow from it when the obligation actually takes effect — often there is then a transition period between publication and the moment when compliance becomes mandatory. Until then, the general ESPR framework applies to furniture, but not the specific obligation for a passport. This page will be updated once the delegated act is published and the date is confirmed.

What this means in practice

To prepare for this, it is advisable to follow the sequence in which it becomes relevant. First: check whether a delegated act has already been published for your own product group within furniture — as long as that is not the case, no action is required on the basis of the ESPR. Then, as soon as that act is in place: check what it contains, because the requirements and the transition period are set separately for each product group. From the moment the obligation takes effect, a product without a passport can be treated by a market surveillance authority as a non-compliant product within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. That regulation gives surveillance authorities the power to check products, to require corrective measures from a market participant, and to restrict a product's access to the market or have it withdrawn from the market when it does not meet the requirements. Which measure is taken in a specific case is determined by the surveillance authority itself on the basis of the circumstances. Additionally, it is important to know that the ESPR in Article 40 specifically addresses circumvention of requirements — for example, by modifying a product so that it appears to fall outside the scope of a requirement, or by degrading a product's performance after assessment. That article is not directed at simply not having a passport before it is required, but rather at conduct aimed at evading a future or existing obligation.

Where this follows from: 2019/1020 and Article 40 ESPR

The basis for what is stated above lies in two texts. Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 governs how market surveillance and product compliance are organised within the EU, including the powers of surveillance authorities for products that do not meet applicable requirements — this is the framework that will apply once a passport obligation for furniture comes into force and is not complied with. Article 40 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) governs the prevention of circumvention of requirements and of performance degradation, and is relevant for situations in which a market participant attempts to evade a (future) obligation rather than comply with it.

What to do now

If you manufacture, import or furnish furniture for projects, it is best to keep track of the publication of the delegated act for furniture and in the meantime maintain your own product data in a structured manner — material origin, composition, repair and recycling information — so that this data is ready as soon as a passport becomes mandatory. Furnipas monitors the publication of the delegated act and updates this page as soon as the date is confirmed.

This is based on

The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We refer per statement; you do not need to believe us.

What you concretely have to do

What is expected of you

Once the delegated act for furniture enters into force, a digital product passport must be included with any piece of furniture placed on the market. That passport is not a separate document that "also has to be added", but part of the product itself: without a passport, a piece of furniture within the scope of that obligation is not complete. What this concretely means depends on the role that a company plays in the supply chain.

Ensuring that a passport exists

The party qualifying as a manufacturer bears the responsibility that a passport exists for a product, with correct and up-to-date information. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this often means that one person or department must keep track: which product lines are already covered, which are not yet, and what information (materials, origin, repair information) is needed for them. Anyone unsure whether that role lies with their own company can read about it in more detail on who is responsible for the product passport for furniture?.

Knowing what role you play

Not every company is a manufacturer in the sense of the regulation, even if it feels that way. A company that imports furniture from a country outside the EU, or that has furniture made under its own brand, may have the same obligations as a manufacturer. The question am I an importer or manufacturer according to the ESPR? is therefore not only theoretical: it determines who must have the passport compiled and who is accountable for it.

Keeping the passport accessible

A passport that exists but is not reachable via the QR data carrier on the product does not actually meet the purpose of the regulation. For a growing company, this means that the link between product, data carrier and online passport must be part of the production process, not a manual post-processing step that gets skipped when things get busy.

Responding to requests from enforcement authorities

Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 gives market surveillance authorities the power to request documentation and conformity information from economic operators. A company that places a piece of furniture on the market without a passport, or with a passport that does not match the delivered product, risks a surveillance authority asking questions about it. Distributors and retailers who resell a product may also encounter this; what is specifically expected of them is stated on what obligations does a distributor or retailer of furniture have?.

Not circumventing or weakening performance

Article 40 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is aimed at preventing circumvention and weakening of performance: adapting or presenting a product so that it appears to comply without actually doing so falls under this. For practical purposes, this means that a passport that exists but contains outdated, incomplete or deliberately favourable information does not serve the same function as a passport that correctly describes the product.

Where things go wrong in practice

A new collection goes out the door without a passport. At a product launch, attention is focused on design, price and delivery time. The passport will "be taken care of later" — and then remains undone until a customer, purchaser or enforcement authority asks for it.

Private label furniture is sold without it being clear who supplies the information. A retail chain sells furniture under its own brand, manufactured by a third party. Both parties think the other is supplying the passport information. An explanation of who exactly is responsible in that relationship is on who must provide the passport data for private label furniture.

A supplier outside the EU supplies incomplete information. An importer orders a furniture line from a manufacturer outside the Union and only discovers when compiling the passport that material information or repair information is missing. What is and is not on the importer's plate is described on my manufacturer is outside the EU — who arranges the product passport then?.

Sale via a marketplace without anyone linking the passport to the listing. A piece of furniture is offered via an online marketplace, but the QR code or link to the passport is missing from the product page, even though it is on the physical product — or vice versa.

Existing stock will be sold without a passport after the obligation date. A company assumes that furniture already produced before the implementation date will not be affected, without having verified this. That assumption deserves a check on does the product passport also apply to furniture that I am already bringing to market.

What you can put in order now

  • An overview of product lines with the passport status per line: available, in preparation, or not yet started.
  • Agreements with suppliers and manufacturers about who provides which data, and at what point in the production process — including what happens if data is missing or proves to be incorrect. See also what is at stake with who is liable for incorrect data from a supplier in the passport.
  • A documented procedure for linking the QR data carrier to the physical product and to the online listing when selling through own channels or a marketplace.
  • An internal contact point or responsible role for maintaining passport data, including updates when changes occur in material or composition.
  • Documentation on the retention period and availability of spare parts, insofar as relevant to the passport of a product line — more on that at how long must I keep spare parts for furniture available?.
  • A file per product line with the underlying sources of the passport data, so that when a regulator or trading partner makes an inquiry, it is quickly clear where the information comes from.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, reviewed by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections take priority.