furnipas.eu

how do I calculate the percentage of recyclable material of a piece of furniture

There is no fixed calculation method for furniture yet

At present, there is no established calculation formula for determining the recyclability percentage of a piece of furniture. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) provides the framework within which such a method is to be established, but the actual test, measurement and calculation method follows per product group via a delegated act, as provided for in Article 39 of the ESPR. For furniture, that specific method does not yet exist. What does exist is the principle: recyclability is one of the possible performance requirements that the Commission can attach to a product group on the basis of Articles 5 to 7 of the ESPR, and if that requirement comes, the calculation method comes with it.

For whom this applies, and for whom it does not yet

This question arises at the moment when a delegated act for furniture is in place that sets recyclability as a requirement and couples a calculation method to it. Until then, there is no obligation to calculate or publish a recyclability percentage, even if a manufacturer or importer is already working with a digital product passport for other data. It is therefore something different from the question of which materials are in a piece of furniture or how those are recorded per component — the latter is an information requirement that can exist independently of a percentage calculation, see also or material per component of a piece of furniture must be recorded. A recyclability percentage is an outcome of a calculation based on those material data, not the material data themselves. Anyone who now collects material information is building the foundation on which a future calculation will rest, but that is a different step from the calculation itself.

When this comes into force is not yet certain

No date is known on which a calculation method for the recyclability of furniture will come into force. The Commission's work plan for the ESPR covers the period 2025-2030, and a delegated act for furniture is provided for in it. As long as that act has not been established and published, no mandatory method applies and therefore no mandatory percentage either. Until then, a manufacturer or importer can make an estimate or claim about recyclability on their own initiative, but this then happens outside the framework of the ESPR and without the certainty that that calculation will later align with the method that the Commission ultimately establishes. As soon as the delegated act for furniture is published, the date and content of the method will be incorporated here.

What to do while the method is still lacking

The most practical approach is to start with the data that the calculation will later need, rather than waiting for the formula itself. A recyclability calculation normally relies on three types of data: which materials are in the product and in what quantity, how those materials are connected to each other, and whether they can be separated at the end of their life. That last point directly relates to what must be included in a disassembly instruction: a piece of furniture that is easy to disassemble into separable material streams is usually also easier to assess for recyclability than a piece of furniture in which materials are permanently bonded or laminated. Anyone who now records which material is in which component and how components are joined together does not have to reconstruct that information later retroactively.

A second point of attention is textiles and upholstery, because these often consist of blend fabrics that are assessed separately for separability; how that recording looks is described in recording data on textiles and upholstery. Hazardous substances also play a role: material that is technically separable but contains substances that limit the recycling route counts differently in most calculation methods than clean material, which is a reason to look now at which hazardous substances must be listed in the product passport of a piece of furniture. Anyone who has these three files in order — material per component, disassembly, hazardous substances — will be well positioned once the method for furniture is established, regardless of what that method looks like precisely.

The legal basis: Article 39, read together with Articles 5 to 7

Article 39 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) provides that the Commission shall establish test, measurement and calculation methods for each product group that are necessary to demonstrate whether a product complies with the requirements applicable to that group. Recyclability is not elaborated in the ESPR itself as a percentage or formula; it is one of the possible ecodesign requirements that the Commission may impose per product group on the basis of Articles 5 to 7 of the ESPR. These two provisions therefore belong together: first there must be a substantive requirement that and how recyclability is assessed, and only then follows the calculation method by which that is demonstrated. Once that requirement and method are in place for furniture, Article 10 of the ESPR will also become relevant, because that article governs what information must appear in the digital product passport — a calculated recyclability percentage could then become a passport data item, alongside the other data already described in what data will be included in the product passport for furniture.

Anyone wishing to follow this file can best monitor the publication of the delegated act for furniture and in the meantime get the underlying material, disassembly and substance data in order, so that a future calculation does not have to start from scratch.

What you concretely have to do

What is expected of you

A recyclability percentage is not a figure that a manufacturer invents themselves or estimates intuitively. The idea behind the ESPR is that such a percentage is calculated according to a fixed, verifiable method, so that the passport of two comparable chairs also provides truly comparable information. For furniture, that method has not yet been established — the manner of calculation comes in a product-specific delegated act, and that does not yet exist for furniture. What does already exist is the legal framework within which that method must fit.

Calculating according to an established method, not at your own discretion

Article 39 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) stipulates that test, measurement and calculation methods for ecodesign requirements must be reliable, accurate and reproducible, and that the Commission establishes these methods in product-specific regulations. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means above all: waiting for the final calculation rules is not a delay you cause yourself, but the intention of the system. A percentage that a company calculates now on the basis of its own assumption about "recyclable material" is not automatically the value that must appear in the passport later.

Recyclability results from material composition

Articles 5 to 7 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) link ecodesign requirements to aspects such as durability, reusability, and the potential for recycling of a product. A recyclability percentage is in practice an addition: what part of the weight or number of components of a piece of furniture consists of material that can be processed via existing recycling routes. This means that the basis for this percentage already lies earlier in the process, namely in the question do I have to record the material for each part of a piece of furniture? Without a component-by-component overview of materials, no percentage can be calculated, not later and not now by way of preparation.

The percentage must then be traceable as a passport field

Article 10 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) sets requirements for the content and structure of the digital product passport, including that data is linked to a specific product and traceable to its source. For a recyclability percentage, this means that not only the final figure is relevant, but also the underlying calculation: which materials are included, what weight is used, what assumption is made about disassembly. This is different from the question according to which method must I measure the values for the passport?, which concerns the measurement method of a specific property; here it is about the calculation that arrives at one percentage on the basis of multiple data points.

Where things go wrong in practice

A common assumption is that "recyclable material" is simply equal to "material that can theoretically be recycled", without considering whether the component can actually be separated from other materials. A wooden panel with a non-removable plastic coating is theoretically partially recyclable wood, but in practice often cannot be separated without the disassembly possibilities described in what must be included in the disassembly instructions?

A second situation: companies calculate a percentage based on the weight of loose raw materials at purchase, while the passport expects a percentage of the finished product — including glues, coatings and fastening material that can drastically change the picture.

Also difficult: composite materials and textile combinations. Upholstery with a mix of fibres, foam and a non-removable cover is often treated as "one material" in an initial calculation, while each layer should be assessed separately. This directly touches on the question how do I record data on textiles and upholstery in the product passport?

A fourth situation arises with metal parts that are technically fully recyclable, but where a manufacturer forgets that surface treatments or mixed alloys limit practical recyclability. The percentage is then estimated too optimistically based on the base material, without accounting for the finish.

Finally: companies that calculate a percentage once when a product is introduced and never adjust that figure again, even when a supplier of, for example, foam or coating changes. This touches on the question how often must I update the data in the product passport?

What you can put in order now

  • A component-by-component material list per product model, including weight and material type, as the basis for any future calculation.
  • An overview of coatings, glues, and surface treatments per component, with a note on whether these affect the separability of the material.
  • The sources and versions of the material data supplied by suppliers, so that a percentage can later be traced back to the original information.
  • A note on each model about which components are and are not removable, as a link to the disassembly information.
  • A log of material or supplier changes per product model, so it is clear when a previously calculated percentage is no longer up to date.
  • Once the definitive calculation method is published: a documented explanation of the calculation method used and the assumptions made, so that this can be reconstructed in a later audit.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not right? Let us know — corrections take priority.