must I have the CO2 footprint of my piece of furniture calculated for the passport
Not yet, as long as product requirements for furniture have not been established
A CO2 footprint will only appear in the product passport of a piece of furniture if the product-specific rules require it, and those rules do not yet exist for furniture. The ESPR itself does not directly mandate the calculation of a CO2 footprint; the regulation provides the framework within which, for each product group, information and performance requirements are laid down, including the question of whether a climate-related indicator such as the CO2 footprint becomes mandatory. For furniture, that implementation still needs to take place. Until then, there is no legal basis to regard a CO2 calculation as a mandatory part of the passport.
For which furniture this becomes relevant, and for which it does not
The question of whether a CO2 footprint becomes mandatory will only apply in the future to product groups for which this is explicitly included in a delegated act. Not every product within the ESPR receives the same requirements: the regulation works with tailor-made rules per product group, laid down via the ecodesign requirements and information requirements in articles 5 to 7 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). For furniture, that implementation does not yet exist. This means that a manufacturer or importer preparing a passport now does not need to reserve a CO2 figure because "it will come anyway" — that has not yet been established, and the form in which it may eventually come (a single figure, a range, a mandatory calculation method) is equally uncertain. This distinction is particularly relevant alongside other passport data that are already being concretely filled in, such as what data will be included in the product passport for furniture on the basis of the general structure in article 10.
When this will apply is not yet established
There is no fixed date on which a CO2 footprint for furniture becomes mandatory, because the delegated act with product requirements for furniture has not yet been published. According to the ESPR work plan 2025-2030, that act is expected around 2028, but that is a schedule and not an established obligation — the actual content and date of application will only become clear once the text is published. Until then, no obligation applies to furniture to calculate or report a CO2 footprint, simply because the legal basis for it is lacking. Once the delegated act for furniture is known, this article will be updated with the date stated in it.
What concretely needs to be done now
For those preparing the passport now, it is practical to focus on data that is already fixed or expected in the short term, rather than spending time on a CO2 calculation that has no legal basis yet. Concretely, this means, in the order in which it is usually tackled:
First get the basic data in order that is almost certain to become part of the passport, such as material composition. Those who need to record this for each part of a piece of furniture — the frame, the upholstery, the fasteners — will find this information at record materials per part of a piece of furniture. After that, it is useful to look at data that relates to measurement, such as emission classes or contents of certain substances, and to check according to which method measurement must be performed once that becomes relevant — this touches on article 39 of the ESPR, which establishes the frameworks for test, measurement and calculation methods once a product group receives specific requirements.
If you want to track climate data now — for example because a customer, contracting authority or your own sustainability policy requires it — you can certainly do so, but that is then your own choice or a contractual agreement, not an ESPR obligation. It is advisable to document such a calculation separately and not automatically align it with the legally required product passport, because the method and scope may still change when the official rules do appear. A calculation that is now made on your own initiative may then need to be adapted to a mandatory method that is established later.
Finally, it is wise to take into account the fact that a possible CO2 obligation will likely come with requirements regarding substantiation and updating. How often product passport data must be updated once a product group falls under specific requirements is described at how up-to-date the data in the product passport must be.
Where that is stated: Articles 5-7, 10 and 39 of the ESPR
The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) establishes in Articles 5 to 7 that ecodesign requirements — including any climate indicators — are determined per product group via delegated acts, not directly by the regulation itself. Article 10 describes which categories of information can be included in a digital product passport, but this is also concretely specified per product group. Article 39 provides that once a calculation such as a carbon footprint is made mandatory for a product group, this must be done according to an established test, measurement or calculation method — precisely to prevent each manufacturer from using their own method. For furniture, the delegated act that would concretely implement these articles is missing, and with it the obligation.
What to do next
Anyone preparing a passport now can best complete the certain components first — materials, composition, and any substance information — and leave the CO2 question aside until the delegated act for furniture has been published. This page will be updated as soon as that text is available and it is clear whether, how and from when a carbon footprint for furniture becomes mandatory.
This is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 39 (test, measurement and calculation methods)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Articles 5 to 7 (ecodesign requirements, performance and information requirements)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), article 10 (requirements for the digital product passport)
The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We refer per statement; you do not need to believe us.
What you concretely have to do
What is expected of you
The carbon footprint is not yet a fixed requirement for furniture
The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) makes it possible to set specific requirements for ecodesign per product group, including requirements on environmental impact such as a carbon footprint. This is done via delegated acts per product group, as described in Articles 5 to 7 of the ESPR. For furniture, that delegated act does not yet exist. There is therefore currently no established obligation to calculate a carbon footprint for furniture and include it in the product passport. What will be included in the product passport is described on the page about what data will be included in the product passport for furniture; a CO2 figure is not yet standard there.
If a CO2 requirement comes, the calculation method matters
Should a requirement to calculate a carbon footprint for furniture ever come into effect, Article 39 of the ESPR stipulates that this must be done according to an established test, measurement or calculation method. Your own estimate or a general life cycle assessment will not simply suffice; the method is determined per product group, just as already applies to other values that go into the product passport. How this works in practice is explained on the page about which method is used to measure the values for the product passport. A company that already works with a CO2 calculation — for example for an ecolabel, a tender or internal reporting — would be wise to retain the method used and the underlying data, so that they can be easily traced later if a mandatory method is introduced.
The product passport must be ready for an expansion
Article 10 of the ESPR describes the technical requirements for the digital product passport, including the requirement that the passport remains current and accessible throughout the entire lifespan of the product. This means that a passport created now without CO2 data must be able to be supplemented later once that requirement does apply. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this is primarily a technical and organisational matter: the platform and the chosen data carrier must be able to process an update without the passport having to be recreated. How often and under what circumstances data are updated is described on the page about how up-to-date the data in the product passport must be.
Where things go wrong in practice
An importer includes a CO2 figure in the passport on its own initiative, based on a calculation from a supplier on another continent, without it being clear which method was used for it. As soon as a customer or supervisor asks how the figure was determined, there is no substantiation available.
A manufacturer confuses the CO2 footprint with the recyclability percentage or with the environmental information that is already being requested via other legislation, and thinks that one of those figures can also serve as the CO2 footprint. These are different calculations with a different basis; how the recyclability percentage is determined is described on the page about calculating the percentage of recyclable material of a piece of furniture, and that is not a substitute for a CO2 calculation.
A project manager promises in a tender that the passport will contain "a CO2 footprint per piece of furniture", without knowing whether and when that requirement will actually apply. That promise cannot be fulfilled as long as the delegated act is not in place, and leads to discussion with the contracting authority.
A company has an external party carry out a CO2 calculation, but does not retain the underlying assumptions and data. If a mandatory method comes later, the calculation will probably have to be done all over again, because it is no longer possible to determine which choices were made.
A manufacturer assumes that a CO2 figure "must go somewhere", and therefore fills in the passport with an unsubstantiated estimate, while there is no obligation at all for furniture to do so. This creates an expectation with the customer that is not sustainable.
What you can put in order now
- The date and version of the ESPR text consulted, so that later it is clear which version of the legislation was used as a starting point.
- Any existing CO2 calculations (for eco-labels, tenders or internal purposes), including the method used, the system boundaries and the sources of the data.
- Contact details and agreements with suppliers about who supplies which environmental data, so that a future CO2 requirement does not lead to a search for missing data.
- An overview of which data are already in the passport, to be reconciled with the page about what data will be included in the product passport for furniture, so that it is clear what may need to be supplemented later.
- A note in the internal file that the CO2 footprint for furniture is not yet mandatory, with a reference to the status of the ESPR work plan, so that the organisation does not accidentally communicate obligations that do not yet exist.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not right? Let us know — corrections take priority.